Dismissed for Breaching Work Pass Conditions: Is It Wrongful Dismissal in Singapore?

By Johnathan Lee, Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore). Updated 6 November 2026.

Not automatically. A breach of work pass conditions is first a matter between the pass holder, the employer and the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, which can mean fines, revocation of the pass or a bar on future passes. Whether the employer was entitled to dismiss you is a separate question under section 14 of the Employment Act 1968: was the dismissal “without just cause or excuse”? If the employer relies on the breach as misconduct, it must prove it and must have held a due inquiry first, and a breach the employer itself caused or knew about is a weak foundation for dismissal. A wrongful dismissal claim must be started at the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) within one month.

What are the work pass conditions, and where do they come from?

The Controller of Work Passes issues every work pass under section 7 of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act (EFMA), “with or without conditions”. The standard conditions sit in Schedules to the Employment of Foreign Manpower (Work Passes) Regulations 2012 (MOM publishes them as its “Conditions of Work Pass”). Each Schedule separates the employer’s conditions from the pass holder’s.

Pass	Employer’s conditions	Pass holder’s conditions
Work Permit (other than domestic workers)	Fourth Schedule, Parts III and IV (reg 4(3))	Fourth Schedule, Parts VI and VII (reg 4(5))
S Pass	Fifth Schedule, Parts I and II (reg 5(3))	Fifth Schedule, Parts III and IV (reg 5(3))
Employment Pass	Sixth Schedule, Parts I and II (reg 6(3))	Sixth Schedule, Part III (reg 6(3))

A Work Permit holder must “work only for the employer specified and in the occupation and sector specified in the work permit”, and must not carry on a business without the Controller’s prior written approval. The employer, in turn, must not let the worker be employed by anyone else, must not deploy the worker in a different occupation or sector, and must not cut the declared salary without the worker’s prior written agreement. MOM’s FAQ on multiple jobs states that “All work pass holders must only work for their designated employer.” Side work is covered in Can EP or S Pass holders volunteer or do side work?

Changes to the job are regulated too, and the duty usually sits with the employer. For an Employment Pass, MOM’s notification page requires the employer to apply “at least 1 month before the date you intend to lower the salary” and to request any change of occupation.

What can MOM do about a breach, and how is that different from the dismissal question?

There are two separate tracks.

	MOM’s enforcement (EFMA)	Employment law (Employment Act)
The question	Was a condition of the pass breached, and by whom?	Was the dismissal with just cause or excuse?
Who can be liable	The employer, the foreign employee, or both	The employer, if the dismissal was wrongful
Outcomes	Fine, imprisonment, financial penalty, revocation of the pass, debarment	Reinstatement or compensation ordered by the Employment Claims Tribunals (ECT)
Where it is decided	MOM and the courts; appeal to the Minister against the Controller’s decisions	TADM mediation, then the ECT

Under section 22(1)(a) of the EFMA, an employer or foreign employee who contravenes a condition of the pass (other than a “regulatory condition”) commits an offence (fine up to $10,000, up to 12 months’ imprisonment, or both). Breach of a “regulatory condition” attracts a financial penalty of up to $10,000 instead (section 25). The Controller may also revoke the pass or debar a person for a fixed period (section 7(5)); an aggrieved person may appeal to the Minister, whose decision is final (section 7(10)). If MOM calls you in, read MOM has called me for an interview: what should I do?

If the Controller revokes or suspends a pass, section 9(1) requires the employer to end the employment within 7 days of being notified. Section 9(5)(c) then provides that such a termination is not to be the subject matter of “any method of redress whether or not under any written law”. Section 9(5) is framed in industrial relations terms, and I have found no decision on how it applies to a claim before the ECT. Where the employment ends because MOM revoked the pass, the Act points instead to an appeal to the Minister against the Controller’s decision (section 7(10)). Where the employer dismisses on its own initiative, the ordinary Employment Act test applies.

Does a breach of pass conditions give my employer just cause to dismiss me?

Section 14(2) of the Employment Act lets a “relevant employee” claim reinstatement or compensation if dismissed “without just cause or excuse”. MOM’s coverage page confirms the Act “covers local and foreign employees” (domestic workers and seafarers are excluded). A manager or executive dismissed with notice or salary in lieu must have served at least 6 months; otherwise there is no minimum service (section 14(2A)).

Under the Tripartite Guidelines on Wrongful Dismissal, a dismissal with notice is presumed not to be wrongful (para 7), but is wrongful if the stated reason is proven false or the real reason is wrongful (para 9). “Misconduct is the only legitimate reason for dismissal without notice” (para 5). Where the employer dismisses without notice, or with notice for stated misconduct, it must prove the ground (Employment Claims Act 2016, section 27(2)).

The misconduct in section 14(1) must be “inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conditions of the employee’s service”. Those are the terms of the employment contract, not of the pass, so the real question is whether the conduct also breached the contract. Concealing a second paid job in breach of an exclusivity clause may well be misconduct. A paperwork lapse that was the employer’s responsibility, or an activity the employer approved, is much harder to describe that way.

Is a pass breach misconduct that needs a due inquiry?

If the employer treats it as misconduct, yes. Section 14(1) allows dismissal without notice only “after due inquiry”. In JGP v JGQ [2026] SGECT 1 at [82] (a decision the employer has applied for leave to appeal, at [8]), the tribunal said this requires, in substance, “adequate and reasonably clear notice of the allegations”, “a real opportunity for the employee to answer”, and “an open-minded consideration of that explanation” before the employer decides. At [68], it held that whenever misconduct is “the real basis for ending the employment, the due inquiry precondition is engaged”, even if the employer chooses to pay notice.

For a pass breach, that means stating the alleged activity, showing the evidence, and hearing the explanation before deciding. Section 14(1) puts the inquiry on the employer; it does not treat an MOM investigation as a substitute. See Due inquiry before dismissing for misconduct.

What if the employer caused or knew about the breach?

Many breaches start with the employer: lending the worker to a related company, deploying the worker in an undeclared role, or cutting salary without telling MOM. Those breach the employer’s own conditions. In JJA v JJJ [2026] SGECT 17, an Employment Pass holder had in practice worked as a minimart shop assistant ([1]). The tribunal said the employer’s explanation gave “reason to question whether the designation used for the Employment Pass reflected the work actually intended”, though the evidence did not permit a finding of a false declaration ([22]). That was a salary claim, not a dismissal claim, but the tribunal examined what the employer itself declared and did. It also identified the Employment Pass and S Pass conditions as sitting in the Sixth and Fifth Schedules ([13] and [14]).

An employer that arranged or accepted the activity will find it difficult to prove the employee’s misconduct. If the breach is raised only after a salary complaint or a TADM filing, the Guidelines treat dismissal to punish an employee for exercising an employment right as wrongful (para 12). Dismissal does not remove the employer’s own EFMA exposure.

What happens to my pass, and can I still claim if I leave Singapore?

The employer must cancel the pass “Within 1 week after the last day of notice” and settle outstanding salary first (MOM’s Employment Pass, S Pass and Work Permit pages). A Work Permit holder’s ticket home must depart within 14 days of cancellation. Afterwards an Employment Pass holder may get a Short-Term Visit Pass of up to 90 days, an S Pass holder up to 30 days, and a Work Permit holder a Special Pass based on the departure date. You cannot work once the pass is cancelled. See Work pass cancelled or on a Special Pass, and for employers, Terminating a foreign employee.

In a written answer on 7 May 2024, MOM said foreign workers “are allowed to remain in Singapore if there are wrongful dismissal claims that have yet to be resolved”, on special passes. TADM says a Singpass is needed to file, mediation may be online or in person, and a claimant who does not attend has the case discontinued. Neither the Employment Claims Act nor the TADM and court pages I read say what happens to a claim once the claimant has left Singapore: they do not say it ends, and they do not say it continues. What they make clear is that a claimant must be able to take part, which is a practical reason to file before leaving.

Section 3(2)(d) of the Employment Claims Act requires the mediation request to be made “not later than one month after the date of the dismissal”. TADM counts from the last date of employment. The statute governs, so file within one month of being told. See Was my dismissal wrongful? for what the ECT can award.

When should I speak to a lawyer?

If you are the pass holder, consider advice now if:

• you were dismissed without notice and never given a chance to answer the allegation;
• your employer approved, arranged or knew about the activity;
• the breach was raised only after you complained about salary or approached TADM or MOM;
• MOM has asked you to attend an interview or give a statement;
• your pass is being cancelled and the one-month deadline is close.

If you are the employer, consider advice before you act if:

• you intend to dismiss without notice and have not put the allegation to the employee;
• the breach stems from a role, salary or deployment decision your company made or did not report;
• the employee has a pending salary complaint or TADM claim;
• MOM has opened an investigation or notified you of a revocation;
• you are unsure whether to dismiss, give notice, or first correct the position with MOM.

Lawyers cannot appear at the ECT, but can advise on your position and preparation.

---

Frequently asked questions

Can my employer dismiss me on the spot for doing side work?

Only if the side work is misconduct under your employment contract and the employer has first held a due inquiry. The employer must prove the misconduct. A dismissal with notice is presumed not wrongful, but can still be wrongful if the stated reason is false.

My employer changed my role or salary without telling MOM. Is that my breach?

The duties to report a lower salary or a change of occupation sit with the employer. An employer that made the change itself will find it difficult to treat it as your misconduct.

If MOM revokes my pass, can I still claim wrongful dismissal?

Where MOM revokes a pass, the employer must end the employment within 7 days, and the EFMA says that termination is not to be the subject of any method of redress. The Act points instead to an appeal to the Minister against MOM’s decision. If your employer dismissed you on its own initiative, the usual Employment Act test applies.

Can I continue my claim after leaving Singapore?

MOM has said it will issue special passes so foreign workers can remain while a wrongful dismissal claim is unresolved. TADM mediation can be online, but a Singpass is needed to file and an absent claimant’s case is discontinued. The official sources do not say what happens once you have left, so it is safer to file before you go.

How long do I have to file a wrongful dismissal claim?

The Employment Claims Act requires the mediation request not later than one month after the date of the dismissal. TADM counts one month from the last date of employment. The statute governs, so file within one month of being told.

This article is general information, not legal advice. It states Singapore law as at November 2026. Speak to a lawyer about your specific situation.