Employment Pass Rejected or Not Renewed: Appeals, COMPASS and the Legal Risks in the Declarations

By Johnathan Lee, Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore). Updated 19 September 2026.

In Singapore, the employer has 3 months from the date of an Employment Pass rejection to appeal through MOM’s EP eService, and MOM processes 85 per cent of appeals within 6 weeks. An appeal is generally worth making only where something material has changed or an error can be corrected, because applications and renewals must clear both the qualifying salary and the 40-point COMPASS framework unless an exemption applies. What is easy to miss is that the application’s declarations carry criminal exposure: a false or misleading statement is an offence under section 22(1)(d) of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, punishable by up to a $20,000 fine, 2 years’ imprisonment, or both, on each charge.

Key facts

  • An EP appeal must be filed within 3 months of rejection, by the employer or its authorised representative only. MOM processes 85% of appeals within 6 weeks. The appeal is a request that MOM look at the application again, not a hearing before a court or tribunal.
  • The EP qualifying salary starts at $5,600 a month ($6,200 in financial services), rising with age to $10,700 ($11,800) at age 45 and above. New applications from 1 January 2027 face $6,000 ($6,600), rising to $11,500 ($12,700) at age 45 and above.
  • COMPASS requires 40 points and applies to renewals where the pass expires on or after 1 September 2024. Candidates on at least $22,500 fixed monthly salary are exempt.
  • Fair Consideration Framework breaches attract work pass debarment of at least 12 months, and up to 24 months in more egregious cases. Debarment covers renewals as well as new applications.
  • A false or misleading statement in a work pass application breaches section 22(1)(d) of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990: up to a $20,000 fine and/or 2 years’ imprisonment per charge.

Why do Employment Pass applications and renewals get rejected?

Most EP rejections come down to a two-stage test, and the first stage is the only one many employers have heard of. Stage one is the qualifying salary: at least $5,600 fixed monthly salary for most sectors, $6,200 for financial services, rising with age to $10,700 ($11,800) at 45. Those floors rise to $6,000 and $6,600 for new applications from 1 January 2027, and for renewals of passes expiring from 1 January 2028.

Stage two is COMPASS, the points framework set out below. This is where employer-side factors bite: a candidate with an excellent salary and degree can still fail because the firm’s workforce is concentrated in one nationality, or its share of local PMET employees is weak against sector peers. MOM is scoring your company, not just your candidate.

In practice, applications also fail for reasons the rejection advisory does not always spell out: qualifications that cannot be verified, inconsistencies between the declared job and the company’s actual business, unresolved tax matters, a newly incorporated or apparently dormant employer, and non-compliance with the Fair Consideration Framework requirement to advertise on MyCareersFuture for at least 14 consecutive days before applying.

The advertising requirement does not apply to every application. MOM exempts jobs in companies with fewer than 10 employees, jobs paying a fixed monthly salary of $22,500 and above, roles filled by an overseas intra-corporate transferee, and short-term deployments where the period of employment in Singapore is not more than 1 month. The last two are narrower than they look, and both are worth reading before relying on either.

An intra-corporate transferee is not simply any employee moved in from abroad. MOM requires the candidate to meet the definition of an overseas ICT under the World Trade Organisation’s General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), or under an applicable free trade agreement to which Singapore is a party. Under GATS that means the candidate must have worked for your company outside Singapore for at least 1 year before being transferred to the Singapore branch, affiliate or subsidiary, and must come in as a manager, an executive or a specialist as MOM defines those terms: a manager primarily directs the organisation or a department or sub-division and has the authority to hire and fire or take other personnel actions; an executive primarily directs the management of the organisation and exercises wide latitude in decision-making; a specialist possesses knowledge at an advanced level of expertise and proprietary knowledge of the organisation’s service, research, equipment, techniques or management. MOM notes that the definition may differ where the candidate comes in under a particular FTA. An employer who posts a junior colleague over from the parent company and calls it a transfer has not met the exemption, and has skipped a mandatory advertisement.

The short-term deployment exemption carries a cost that is easy to miss. MOM allows it where staff are transferred from an overseas branch for a short-term contingency and the period of employment in Singapore is not more than 1 month, but the pass holder is then not eligible to renew that work pass, nor to apply for a new Employment Pass or S Pass, for 3 months after the expiry. It is a route for an unexpected contingency, not a way to place someone the company intends to keep in Singapore.

Confirm whether one of those exemptions covers the vacancy before treating the advertisement as the defect. An employer who uses its one realistic attempt within the 3-month window to cure a requirement that never applied to it will leave the real problem, usually C3 or C4, untouched.

For S Pass candidates, the qualifying salary is at least $3,300 ($3,800 in financial services) for new applications from 1 September 2025. That figure now governs renewals too: it applies to S Passes expiring from 1 September 2026, a date that has passed, so an employer renewing an S Pass today is already inside the new threshold. It rises to $3,600 ($4,000) for new applications from 1 January 2027, alongside sector quotas and levies.

How does COMPASS score an application, and what counts as 40 points?

COMPASS awards points across four foundational criteria and two bonus criteria, and an application passes at 40 points. Each foundational criterion scores 0, 10 or 20, but the bands are set differently. C1 and C4 are percentile comparisons against sector peers. C2 turns on the qualification itself, not on any sector norm. C3 turns on fixed nationality-share thresholds of 5 per cent and 25 per cent.

CriterionWhat MOM measuresPoints
C1 SalaryCandidate’s fixed monthly salary against local PMET salaries in the sector, by age0 / 10 / 20
C2 QualificationsWhether the candidate holds a degree-equivalent, or a top-tier institution qualification0 / 10 / 20
C3 DiversityShare of the candidate’s nationality among the firm’s PMETs0 / 10 / 20
C4 Support for local employmentFirm’s local PMET share against sector peers0 / 10 / 20
C5 Skills bonusJob on the Shortage Occupation List (+20, halved to +10 where the candidate’s nationality is a third or more of the firm’s PMETs)+10 or +20
C6 Strategic economic prioritiesFirm on an eligible programme run by a listed government agency or NTUC+10

Three features matter in practice. C3 and C4 are within the employer’s control and can be improved over time, which drives the appeal-or-reapply decision. Candidates on at least $22,500 fixed monthly salary, overseas intra-corporate transferees and candidates filling a role for one month or less are exempt from COMPASS. The C5 bonus carries a condition that is easy to overlook, and MOM’s own COMPASS guide puts it bluntly: once approved, the EP holder “must only work in the shortage occupation or else it becomes an offence”. Redeploying that employee to another role is a regulatory problem, not merely a trigger for MOM to reassess the pass.

One further point on C1, which is where most renewal failures sit. C1 is not a fixed standard. MOM re-publishes the C1 salary benchmark tables every August, and the table you are scored against depends on when the application is filed and, for a renewal, when the pass expires. The August 2025 tables govern new EP applications from 1 January 2026 to 31 December 2026, and renewals of passes expiring between 1 July 2026 and 30 June 2027. The August 2026 tables take over for new applications from 1 January 2027, and for renewals of passes expiring from 1 July 2027. A salary that scores 10 against one table may score 0 against the next for the same job, so check which table produced the rejection before concluding that the salary was adequate. As at September 2026 the August 2025 tables are still the operative ones, and they are what an appeal or a fresh application filed now will be scored against, so price any increase against them. The August 2026 tables bind nothing yet: they matter only where the new application will be filed on or after 1 January 2027, or the pass being renewed expires on or after 1 July 2027, and an employer whose next cycle falls after those dates should work from the newer figures instead.

How do I appeal a rejected Employment Pass, and is an appeal worth making?

The appeal must be submitted within 3 months of the rejection, through the EP eService, and only by the employer or the authorised third party who filed the application. MOM will deal with no one else: the candidate cannot appeal in his or her own name, and MOM will not take enquiries from the candidate either. A missed window means a fresh application. MOM processes 85 per cent of appeals within 6 weeks, so most outcomes arrive within about six weeks and the remainder take longer. MOM’s guidance is to attach supporting documents only if they are actually required, because unnecessary documents lengthen processing; no documents are needed simply to show that the candidate now meets the salary or COMPASS criteria, that an inconsistency in qualification records has been corrected, that the job advertising requirement has now been met, or that an IRAS tax matter has been resolved.

One point of framing, because the word “appeal” invites the wrong expectation. The appeal is made to MOM and decided by MOM. It is a request that the Ministry look at the application again, not a hearing before a court or a tribunal, and MOM’s own guidance is blunt about what that means: there will be no change in the outcome unless there is new information in the appeal. Do not plan around a review stage above MOM. Plan around getting the substance right, because what you put in front of MOM matters far more than the label on the form.

An appeal is worth making where you can show MOM something new, or correct something that was wrong. Where the facts themselves need time to change, reapply instead. An appeal makes sense where the rejection rests on a factual error or a gap you can close immediately: a qualification the awarding institution will now confirm, or a salary raised to clear the age-adjusted threshold or lift the C1 score. It is usually not worth making where the failure is structural: if the application fell short of 40 COMPASS points on C3 or C4, those scores come from your workforce profile, and no letter changes them within 6 weeks. The realistic path is to improve local PMET hiring or nationality mix and reapply. Weighing this is a routine assessment in my employment law practice.

There is one category where you should pause before appealing at all: where the rejection suggests MOM doubts the truth of the application itself, whether the genuineness of the role, the declared salary or the local recruitment effort. Pressing an appeal on an inaccurate declaration converts a commercial problem into a potential criminal one, as the final section explains.

My EP renewal was rejected in 2026. What should the employer do now?

Act within the same 3-month appeal window, but plan around the pass expiry date, because the right to work does not survive it. Renewals stopped being routine on 1 September 2024: any pass expiring from that date must pass COMPASS on renewal unless the candidate is exempt. In my experience, many of the 2026 renewal rejections involve long-serving pass holders whose salary has not kept pace with the C1 benchmark for their age band, or firms whose C4 local employment score has slipped.

The practical sequence is short. Diagnose the failure first: MOM’s Workforce Insights tool, reached through the myMOM Portal, estimates how the firm scores on the COMPASS criteria within its control, and should be read alongside the rejection advisory. Then decide whether the gap can be closed now. A salary adjustment is often the most effective step, subject to the caution above about which C1 benchmark table the next application will be scored against. If the pass will expire before the appeal is decided, the employee must stop work on expiry; employing a foreigner without a valid pass is itself an offence under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, and passes issued to family members are cancelled with, or on expiry of, the principal pass. Finally, calendar the next cycle: renewals can be filed up to 6 months before expiry, or 3 months before expiry for EP (Sponsorship), and filing early leaves room to appeal or restructure before the deadline rather than after it.

Plan the exit at the same time as the appeal, not after it. MOM is explicit that on cancellation the pass holder cannot work even while waiting to leave Singapore, and that the family passes cancelled alongside cannot be reinstated. The employer can request a short-term visit pass for the holder on cancellation, or within a day after the EP expiry date, which grants a valid stay of up to 90 days to wind matters up.

For the employee, the employer-only rule matters: if your employer will not appeal, your options are a new application through another employer or a different pass type.

What legal risks sit in the application itself?

The application is a set of declarations, and the employer cannot escape responsibility for them by pointing at the agent who typed them. Liability turns on what the declarant knew or ought reasonably to have known, and that cuts both ways: the agent who makes the false statement is exposed under the same provision. Under section 22(1)(d) of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, a statement you know, or ought reasonably to know, is false in any material particular, or misleading by omission, carries up to a $20,000 fine, 2 years’ imprisonment, or both, on each charge. When I prosecuted these cases at MOM, the file rarely started as a criminal matter. It usually started as a rejected application, an audit or an employee’s complaint, and the declarations were then read back against the payroll records.

This is not a point I need to make on my own authority. In October 2025 MOM issued an advisory to employment agencies about fraudulent actions in work pass applications, covering the submission of false information and tampered documents, and the sharing of Singpass accounts with overseas agents; MOM referred that conduct to the police for investigation under the Computer Misuse Act 1993. Two practical rules follow. Never give an agent your Singpass. And before you appeal, retrieve the submitted application and read what was actually declared under your name.

The recurring danger areas are familiar: declared salaries partly returned to the employer, job titles or duties inflated to lift COMPASS scores, qualifications the employer never verified, and Fair Consideration Framework advertisements run as theatre with the candidate pre-selected. FCF breaches attract work pass debarment of at least 12 months, and up to 24 months in more egregious cases. Debarment is not confined to new hires: it extends to renewals of existing passes, so a breach can strand staff you already employ. MOM has also prosecuted employers for false fair hiring declarations under the same Act (a logistics company was fined $18,000 in 2020). Fair hiring is hardening into statute as well: my guide to the Workplace Fairness Act explains what changes when the legislation takes effect.

This is the gap in an appeal that is run only towards approval: nobody stops to ask what the file itself discloses. If any declaration was inaccurate, manage that exposure before amplifying it in an appeal. If you are unsure where your file sits, take advice before you press send.


Frequently asked questions

How long does an Employment Pass appeal take in Singapore?

MOM processes 85 per cent of appeals within 6 weeks, and you can track progress in EP eService. The appeal must be filed within 3 months of the rejection. Allow for six weeks or more from filing to outcome, and use that time to fix whatever caused the rejection.

My candidate did not meet the 40 COMPASS points. Can I still appeal?

Yes, but only usefully if something material has changed: a higher salary that lifts the C1 score, a newly verified qualification for C2, or corrected workforce data affecting C3 or C4. If nothing has changed, improve the firm’s scores over time and reapply instead of appealing.

My EP renewal was rejected in 2026. Can the employee keep working?

Only until the current pass expires. Filing an appeal does not extend the right to work, and employing a foreigner without a valid pass is an offence under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990. The employee must stop work on expiry, and passes issued to family members are cancelled with the principal pass.

Can the employee appeal an EP rejection personally?

No. Only the employer, or the authorised third party who submitted the application, can appeal or make enquiries. If your employer declines to appeal, your options are a fresh application through another sponsoring employer or a different pass type. The 3-month appeal window belongs to the employer, not the candidate.

About the author

Johnathan Lee is an Advocate and Solicitor practising at Fong & Fong LLC. He served as a prosecutor at the Ministry of Manpower before moving into private practice, where he now acts for both employers and employees in MOM investigations, employment offences and workplace disputes.

He holds a Juris Doctor, awarded cum laude, from Singapore Management University, and a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology with a second major in Communication Studies, awarded Second Class Upper Honours, from Nanyang Technological University. He teaches business negotiations at James Cook University, Singapore Campus, as a sessional associate educator.

Speak to Johnathan

I used to prosecute employers at MOM. Now I act for employers and employees on work pass rejections, appeals and investigations. Message me before you file anything.

Johnathan Lee, Advocate and Solicitor (Fong & Fong LLC) · 21 Merchant Road #04-00 Unit 502 Singapore 058267 · +65 8878 6467 · johnathan.lee@fongllc.com

This article is general information, not legal advice. It states Singapore law as at 19 September 2026. Speak to a lawyer about your specific situation.

Discover more from Johnathan Lee Kui Bao

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading